Mathstub
Multi-state moves & IPO eventsMathstub Editorial

CA → TX with unvested RSUs: the work-source allocation trap

When you move CA → TX with unvested RSUs, California does not stop taxing them. CA uses "work-source allocation" (per FTB Pub 1004): for each vest, the vesting period is split by months worked in each state, and CA taxes its share of the vest at the top marginal rate (13.3%) even after you have moved. A 4-year vest cliff with a Year 2 move means CA taxes ~50% of remaining vests over the next 2 years — typically $20–$40k of surprise tax. Plan estimated payments to CA for the post-move years to avoid §19136 underpayment penalties.

← all guides✓ Reviewed against IRS sourcesFree · no signup
4 min read · 914 words

Tax year 2026 · Last updated June 7, 2026

A common belief: "I moved from California to Texas in August. Texas has no state income tax. So my future RSU vests are tax-free at the state level." This is wrong, and it is wrong by tens of thousands of dollars over a typical 4-year vest cliff. California uses a work-source allocation rule that taxes your unvested equity comp based on where you worked during the vesting period — not where you live when it vests.

The work-source rule, explained

California Franchise Tax Board (FTB) Publication 1004, "Stock Options," articulates the rule clearly: equity compensation income is sourced to the state where the services were performed during the vesting period. For a 4-year RSU vest:

  • Each quarterly vest covers a portion of the vesting period (typically the months between grant and that vest).
  • For each vest, the vesting period is split into "months worked in CA" and "months worked elsewhere."
  • CA taxes its proportional share of the vest at its top marginal rate (13.3% — the highest state rate in the US).
  • The OTHER state (or no state, if you move to TX/FL/NV/WA) taxes its share.

Worked example — Daniel's CA→TX move

Daniel is a senior engineer who:

  • Worked in CA from August 15, 2022 to July 31, 2024 (24 months in CA).
  • Moved to TX on August 1, 2024.
  • Has 1,600 unvested RSUs from a grant dated August 15, 2022, vesting quarterly through August 2026.
  • Each vest hits at ~$20,000 FMV.

Daniel assumed: "TX has no state tax. My post-August-2024 vests are CA-tax-free." Walking the FTB work-source rule:

CA → TX move with 1,600 unvested RSUs
Daniel assumed$0 CA tax
CA actually claims~$16,800
Each $20k vest still owes CA — its share shrinks as TX months add up
VestCA months / totalCA %CA tax
Aug 202424 / 24100%$2,660
Nov 202424 / 2788.9%$2,365
Feb 202524 / 3080.0%$2,128
May 202524 / 3372.7%$1,934
Aug 202524 / 3666.7%$1,773
Nov 202524 / 3961.5%$1,636
Feb 202624 / 4257.1%$1,519
May 202624 / 4553.3%$1,418
Aug 202624 / 4850.0%$1,330

Total CA tax owed across post-move vests: roughly $16,800 of CA state tax that Daniel did not expect. Adding state-AMT exposure on any ISO exercises during the CA work period: another $1k–$5k.

If Daniel does not file quarterly estimates to CA, CA §19136 underpayment penalties (~5% annualized): another $400–$1,500 on top.

Filing mechanics — Form 540NR

For tax years 2024 onward (after Daniel's move), he is a NON-RESIDENT of California with CA-sourced income. He files:

  • Form 540NR (CA non-resident return). Reports the CA-allocated portion of each vest as CA-source income. He pays CA tax at the top marginal rate on that allocated portion.
  • Federal Form 1040 treats all RSU income normally (no state distinction).
  • No TX state return required (TX has no state income tax).

For 2024 specifically (the move year), Daniel is a PART-YEAR RESIDENT and files the long Form 540NR with both the resident-period income and the non-resident-period CA-source income.

How to avoid the CA §19136 underpayment penalty

CA expects you to make quarterly estimated payments on CA-source income, including these allocated RSU vests.

Most tech workers who move are surprised by the CA tax liability AT FILING because their employer (now TX-payrolled) is no longer withholding CA tax.

Two safe-harbor mechanisms under CA §19136:

  1. Pay 90% of the current-year CA tax through withholding + estimates by Q4 (Jan 15 of the following year).
  2. Pay 110% of last year's CA tax (if CA AGI was over $150k) or 100% (if under) through the same channels.

For a post-move resident, the cleanest path: estimate your post-move CA tax using the work-source rule, divide by 4, and submit CA Form 540-ES quarterly.

Mathstub's Multi-State Equity Comp Tax Planner walks the allocation per vest + the quarterly estimate calculation.

Variants — NY, NJ, MA, OR

California is the most aggressive but not unique. Several other states apply work-source allocation to equity comp:

  • New York: uses a similar allocation rule + the notorious "convenience of the employer" rule, which can claim 100% of your income even after a move if the employer is NY-based and the move was for your convenience (not employer-driven). See NY Tax Bulletin TSB-M-06(5)I.
  • New Jersey: day-count method for non-residents; effective work-source allocation.
  • Massachusetts: TIR 02-21 walks the stock-comp allocation rules for non-residents.
  • Oregon: Day-count allocation under ORS 316.127.
  • Pennsylvania: Different rules — PA doesn't allocate based on vesting period in the same way; check REV-714.

How to model your situation

Three things to do before / during your move:

  1. Pull your offer letter + vest schedule. Note each vest date and the FMV-or-estimated-FMV per vest.
  2. Set your move date. This anchors the "months in CA" calculation for each vest.
  3. Run the Mathstub Multi-State Equity Comp Tax Planner or the State Stock-Comp Lookup. Get the allocated CA tax owed per vest + the quarterly schedule.

Catching this in October (before your first post-move tax year ends) is the difference between a clean transition and a $1,500 underpayment penalty + a confused CPA visit.

Sources & citations

California Revenue and Taxation Code §17041 (top marginal rate); CA RTC §17951 (non-resident income sourcing); CA RTC §19136 (underpayment of estimated tax); CA FTB Publication 1004 (Stock Options); CA FTB Publication 1005 (Pension and Annuity Guidelines); CA FTB Form 540NR (non-resident return); NY TSB-M-06(5)I (NY convenience-of-employer rule); NY Tax Law §631 (non-resident income allocation); Massachusetts TIR 02-21 (stock-comp allocation for non-residents); New Jersey GIT-19 (day-count allocation); Oregon ORS 316.127 (non-resident allocation); Pennsylvania REV-714 (compensation allocation). IRC §83(a) (federal vest income recognition).

Run your own numbers

By Mathstub Editorial · Reviewed by Reviewed against IRS primary sources

Was this helpful?

Spotted a bug, edge case, or numbers that look off? Tell us — we read every report.

mathstub ecosystem · paid notion templates

When a calculator isn’t enough.

See all 4 templates →

Four Notion templates built around the same IRC-cited math the free calculators run — for tracking, planning, and CPA prep across an entire tax year. Lifetime updates included.

Affiliate disclosure — we earn from sales on Mathstub-owned products listed above. Free calculators always stay free.